State v. Francis

552 A.2d 867, 1989 Me. LEXIS 9
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedJanuary 20, 1989
StatusPublished

This text of 552 A.2d 867 (State v. Francis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Francis, 552 A.2d 867, 1989 Me. LEXIS 9 (Me. 1989).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

Calvin Francis appeals the judgment of the Superior Court (Penobscot County; Silsby, J.) entered on his conditional plea of guilty to the charge of operating under the influence. 29 M.R.S.A. § 1312 (1978 & Pamph. 1988). We find no merit in Francis’ contention that the District Court (Bangor; Kravchuk, J.) erred in denying his motion to suppress the results of a blood alcohol test. On the evidence before it, the District Court committed no clear error in its factfinding that the officer requiring the blood test had probable cause to believe Francis had been operating under the influence. See State v. Baker, 502 A.2d 489, 491 (Me.1985).

The entry is:

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED.

All concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Baker
502 A.2d 489 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
552 A.2d 867, 1989 Me. LEXIS 9, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-francis-me-1989.