State v. Francis

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

State v. Francis

536 A.2d 98, 1988 Me. LEXIS 3

DecidedFebruary 1, 1988

StatusPublished

This text of 536 A.2d 98 (State v. Francis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Francis, 536 A.2d 98, 1988 Me. LEXIS 3 (Me. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

Joseph L. Francis appeals from a conviction of assault, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 207 (1983 and Supp.1987), following a jury trial in Superior Court (Penobscot County). On appeal, he challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, we conclude that the jury could rationally find beyond a reasonable doubt every element of the offense charged. See State v. Greene, 512 A.2d 330, 332 (Me.1986); State v. Barry, 495 A.2d 825, 826 (Me.1985).

The entry is:

Judgment affirmed.

All concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

Joseph L. Francis appeals from a conviction of assault, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 207 (1983 and Supp.1987), following a jury trial in Superior Court (Penobscot County). On appeal, he challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, we conclude that the jury could rationally find beyond a reasonable doubt every element of the offense charged. See State v. Greene, 512 A.2d 330, 332 (Me.1986); State v. Barry, 495 A.2d 825, 826 (Me.1985).

The entry is:

Judgment affirmed.

All concurring.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

536 A.2d 98, 1988 Me. LEXIS 3, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-francis-me-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack