State v. Frampton

Supreme Court of Kansas

State v. Frampton

87 P. 1150, 74 Kan. 897, 1906 Kan. LEXIS 187

CourtSupreme Court of Kansas

DecidedNovember 10, 1906

DocketNo. 14,965

StatusPublished

This text of 87 P. 1150 (State v. Frampton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Frampton, 87 P. 1150, 74 Kan. 897, 1906 Kan. LEXIS 187 (kan 1906).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Defendant was convicted of two unlawful sales of intoxicating liquor, and also for maintaining a nuisance. By an election the- state designated the transactions upon which it would rely to establish the sales. The proof was sufficient to support the findings on both counts. A sale by defendant’s barkeeper, at defendant’s place of business, and in his presence, is strong proof of a sale by himself. According to the testimony. ,the witness .Kern bought liquor from the defendant directly, and ■ at other times he was served by those who were assisting in the sale of liquor in defendant’s place of business.

■" The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

Defendant was convicted of two unlawful sales of intoxicating liquor, and also for maintaining a nuisance. By an election the- state designated the transactions upon which it would rely to establish the sales. The proof was sufficient to support the findings on both counts. A sale by defendant’s barkeeper, at defendant’s place of business, and in his presence, is strong proof of a sale by himself. According to the testimony. ,the witness .Kern bought liquor from the defendant directly, and ■ at other times he was served by those who were assisting in the sale of liquor in defendant’s place of business.

■" The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

87 P. 1150, 74 Kan. 897, 1906 Kan. LEXIS 187, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-frampton-kan-1906.