State v. Frakes

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Frakes

309 S.W.3d 879, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 667, 2010 WL 1956884

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 18, 2010

DocketWD 70562

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 309 S.W.3d 879 (State v. Frakes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Frakes, 309 S.W.3d 879, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 667, 2010 WL 1956884 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

David Frakes appeals his conviction for first-degree statutory sodomy, section 566.062, RSMo Cum.Supp.2009, and sentence of twenty-five years imprisonment. He claims that the trial court erred in overruling his motion for new trial based on misrepresentations by the prosecutor in closing argument and in permitting certain expert testimony.

The judgment of conviction is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

David Frakes appeals his conviction for first-degree statutory sodomy, section 566.062, RSMo Cum.Supp.2009, and sentence of twenty-five years imprisonment. He claims that the trial court erred in overruling his motion for new trial based on misrepresentations by the prosecutor in closing argument and in permitting certain expert testimony.

The judgment of conviction is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

309 S.W.3d 879, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 667, 2010 WL 1956884, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-frakes-moctapp-2010.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack