State v. Foye
309 A.2d 897, 63 N.J. 534, 1973 N.J. LEXIS 210
Opinion
The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by the Appellate Division. State of New Jersey v. Foye, 125 N. J. Super. 184 (App. Div. 1973).
For affirmanc e — Chief Justice Garven and Justices Jacobs, Hall, Sullivan, P ashman and Clifford — 6.
Bor reversal — -None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Foye, 309 A.2d 897, 63 N.J. 534, 1973 N.J. LEXIS 210 (N.J. 1973).
309 A.2d 897 (State v. Foye) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services
9 A.3d 882 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2010)
United States of America Ex Rel. James Ellis Foye v. State of New Jersey and Ronald Groomes, Superintendent New Jersey State Prison
547 F.2d 217 (Third Circuit, 1977)
Wigler v. Newark
309 A.2d 897 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1973)