State v. Foy

523 A.2d 209, 105 N.J. 581, 1986 N.J. LEXIS 2270
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedOctober 28, 1986
StatusPublished

This text of 523 A.2d 209 (State v. Foy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Foy, 523 A.2d 209, 105 N.J. 581, 1986 N.J. LEXIS 2270 (N.J. 1986).

Opinion

Petition for certification granted and the Appellate Division judgment is summarily modified to direct that if, on remand ordered by the Appellate Division, the case proceeds to trial and the State seeks to introduce the chemists’ report into evidence, the trial court is to conduct a hearing to develop a factual record for the purpose of determining whether a hearsay exception exists to support the admission of the report into evidence. See State v. Matulewicz, 101 N.J. 27, 31-32 (1985).

Jurisdiction is not retained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Matulewicz
499 A.2d 1363 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
523 A.2d 209, 105 N.J. 581, 1986 N.J. LEXIS 2270, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-foy-nj-1986.