State v. Fox

270 A.2d 608, 110 N.H. 423, 1970 N.H. LEXIS 190
CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire
DecidedOctober 30, 1970
DocketNo. 6021
StatusPublished

This text of 270 A.2d 608 (State v. Fox) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Fox, 270 A.2d 608, 110 N.H. 423, 1970 N.H. LEXIS 190 (N.H. 1970).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Defendant is charged with operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor in violation of RSA 262 - A: 62.

He is the person to whom the report on the blood of David Traxler was sent by mistake. See State v. Traxler, 110 N.H. 410, 269 A.2d 864 (1970). Defendant did not receive a copy of the report of his test within forty-eight hours after August 1, 1969 when it was received by the Department of Safety, as provided in RSA 262-A:69-a. He received actual notice of it on August 1, 1969, and a copy on August 5, 1969.

[424]*424The prosecution in this case asked for a preliminary hearing on the admissibility of the evidence of the test. The matter was transferred here by Brighton., J., District Court Justice.

This case is governed by State v. Traxler supra, which held that the statute does not require the exclusion of the evidence solely because of the failure of the defendant to receive a copy of the report within forty-eight hours.

Remanded.

Kenison, C.J., did not sit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Traxler
269 A.2d 864 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1970)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
270 A.2d 608, 110 N.H. 423, 1970 N.H. LEXIS 190, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-fox-nh-1970.