Home/Supreme Court of North Carolina/State v. Fox

State v. Fox

298 S.E.2d 388, 307 N.C. 460, 1983 N.C. LEXIS 1098
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided January 11, 1983·No. 563A82·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The sole issue presented to this Court is whether the trial court erroneously denied defendant’s motion to suppress evidence obtained from an alleged unlawful stop of defendant. The facts necessary for determination of this case are fully and accurately stated in the Court of Appeals’ opinion. We have carefully reviewed the majority opinion of the Court of Appeals, the dissent, the briefs and authorities relating to defendant’s contentions. We conclude that the result reached by the majority of the panel of the Court of Appeals, its reasoning, and the legal principles enunciated by it are correct.

The decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Fox, 298 S.E.2d 388, 307 N.C. 460, 1983 N.C. LEXIS 1098 (N.C. 1983).

298 S.E.2d 388 (State v. Fox) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Griffin
749 S.E.2d 444 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2013)
State v. Chlopek
704 S.E.2d 563 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2011)
State v. Murray
666 S.E.2d 205 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2008)
State v. Foye
600 S.E.2d 520 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2004)
State v. Blackstock
598 S.E.2d 412 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2004)
State v. Parker
530 S.E.2d 297 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2000)
State v. Watkins
446 S.E.2d 67 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1994)
State v. Watkins
433 S.E.2d 817 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1993)
State v. Allen
367 S.E.2d 684 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1988)