State v. Fox
This text of 298 S.E.2d 388 (State v. Fox) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The sole issue presented to this Court is whether the trial court erroneously denied defendant’s motion to suppress evidence obtained from an alleged unlawful stop of defendant. The facts necessary for determination of this case are fully and accurately stated in the Court of Appeals’ opinion. We have carefully reviewed the majority opinion of the Court of Appeals, the dissent, the briefs and authorities relating to defendant’s contentions. We conclude that the result reached by the majority of the panel of the Court of Appeals, its reasoning, and the legal principles enunciated by it are correct.
The decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
298 S.E.2d 388, 307 N.C. 460, 1983 N.C. LEXIS 1098, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-fox-nc-1983.