State v. Fouts

Oregon Supreme Court

State v. Fouts

276 P. 683, 129 Or. 115, 1929 Ore. LEXIS 113

Oregon Supreme Court·Decided April 3, 1929·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This case involves the question of whether or not a person receiving from another a bottle of intoxicating liquor for the mere purpose of taking a drink therefrom, and then returning the bottle, is guilty of unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor. The learned circuit judge ruled against the state from which the district attorney has appealed. The learned district attorney presented a cogent and logical argument for reversing the ruling of the Circuit Court. The case is controlled, however, by the case of State v. Williams, 117 Or. 238 (243 Pac. 563). The judgment is affirmed. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This case involves the question of whether or not a person receiving from another a bottle of intoxicating liquor for the mere purpose of taking a drink therefrom, and then returning the bottle, is guilty of unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor. The learned circuit judge ruled against the state from which the district attorney has appealed. The learned district attorney presented a cogent and logical argument for reversing the ruling of the Circuit Court. The case is controlled, however, by the case of State v. Williams, 117 Or. 238 (243 Pac. 563). The judgment is affirmed. Affirmed.

State v. Fouts, 276 P. 683, 129 Or. 115, 1929 Ore. LEXIS 113 (Or. 1929).

Pincite

276 P. 683 (State v. Fouts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related