State v. Foust
726 S.E.2d 861, 366 N.C. 243, 2012 WL 2337270, 2012 N.C. LEXIS 471
This text of 726 S.E.2d 861 (State v. Foust) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Foust, 726 S.E.2d 861, 366 N.C. 243, 2012 WL 2337270, 2012 N.C. LEXIS 471 (N.C. 2012).
Opinion
STATE of North Carolina
v.
Theodore Morris FOUST.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Anne M. Middleton, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.
Theodore Morris Foust, for Foust, Theodore Morris.
J. Douglas Henderson, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.
ORDER
Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 19th of June 2012 in this matter for a writ of mandamus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Guilford County:
"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of June 2012."
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
726 S.E.2d 861, 366 N.C. 243, 2012 WL 2337270, 2012 N.C. LEXIS 471, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-foust-nc-2012.