State v. Foust-el

738 S.E.2d 382, 366 N.C. 569, 2013 WL 988624, 2013 N.C. LEXIS 275
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided March 7, 2013·No. 265P12-2·Published

Opinion

1. Defs Pro Se Motion for Averment of Jurisdiction

2. Def’s Pro Se Motion for Federal Question Jurisdiction

1. Dismissed

2. Dismissed

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Foust-el, 738 S.E.2d 382, 366 N.C. 569, 2013 WL 988624, 2013 N.C. LEXIS 275 (N.C. 2013).

738 S.E.2d 382 (State v. Foust-el) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.