State v. FOURTIN

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. FOURTIN

985 A.2d 1062, 294 Conn. 925, 2010 Conn. LEXIS 7

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided January 5, 2010·No. SC 18523·Published

Opinion

The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 118 Conn. App. 43 (AC 29899), is granted, limited to the following issue:

*926 Decided January 5, 2010 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18523. Susann E. Gill, supervisory assistant state’s attorney, in support of the petition. Robert E. Byron, special public defender, in opposition.

“Did the Appellate Court improperly substitute its judgment for that of the jury when it determined that the state did not sustain its burden of proof that the victim was ‘physically helpless’ under General Statutes § 53a-65 (6)?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 118 Conn. App. 43 (AC 29899), is granted, limited to the following issue:

*926 Decided January 5, 2010 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18523. Susann E. Gill, supervisory assistant state’s attorney, in support of the petition. Robert E. Byron, special public defender, in opposition.

“Did the Appellate Court improperly substitute its judgment for that of the jury when it determined that the state did not sustain its burden of proof that the victim was ‘physically helpless’ under General Statutes § 53a-65 (6)?”

State v. FOURTIN, 985 A.2d 1062, 294 Conn. 925, 2010 Conn. LEXIS 7 (Colo. 2010).

Pincite

985 A.2d 1062 (State v. FOURTIN) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related