State v. Foster

31 Tex. 578
CourtTexas Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 15, 1869
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 31 Tex. 578 (State v. Foster) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Foster, 31 Tex. 578 (Tex. 1869).

Opinion

Lindsay, J.

—An indictment for simple fornication does [579]*579not lie under the Penal Code of Texas. The code prescribes that every offense must be defined before it is punishable under the penal laws of the state. A mixed offense of adultery and fornication is defined by the statute, for which each of the parties may be held amenable to the law, and receive the infliction of its penalties. But the definition of this mixed offense is, that the parties must live together in a state of cohabitation. The several provisions of the statute show clearly that the living together in such a state was the specific offense designed to be punished. This is the offense defined as adultery by the statute. The moral offense of fornication is not defined by the code. And it is declared by the code, in Paschal’s Digest, article 1605, “no person shall be punished for any act or omission, as a penal offense, unless the same is expressly defined,” &c. Therefore the indictment, which was for simple fornication, was properly quashed by the court, and the judgment is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

International & G. N. Ry. Co. v. Mallard
277 S.W. 1051 (Texas Commission of Appeals, 1925)
Ex parte Bergen
14 Tex. Ct. App. 52 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1883)
Wolff v. State
6 Tex. Ct. App. 195 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1879)
Parks v. State
4 Tex. Ct. App. 134 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1878)
State v. Randle
41 Tex. 292 (Texas Supreme Court, 1874)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
31 Tex. 578, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-foster-tex-1869.