State v. Foster

Supreme Court of South Carolina

State v. Foster

61 S.E. 564, 80 S.C. 347, 1908 S.C. LEXIS 175

CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina

DecidedMay 21, 1908

Docket6915

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 61 S.E. 564 (State v. Foster) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Foster, 61 S.E. 564, 80 S.C. 347, 1908 S.C. LEXIS 175 (S.C. 1908).

Pincite

Opinion

PER Curiam.

The counsel for appellant have moved to suspend the appeal with leave to move in the Circuit Court for a new trial, on the ground that one of the jurors, Jesse Mahaffey, was not indifferent, but, on the contrary, had determined to convict the defendant before the trial commenced. In support of the motion, the defendant’s counsel have presented affidavits of persons who-swear that Mahaffey, after the trial, declared to them his intention, formed before any evidence was offered, to convict the defendant without respect to the testimony. The Solicitor submitted an 'affidavit of Mahaffey, in which 'he denies that he had made up his mind to convict before hearing the evidence, and says any remarks made about his conduct as a juror in the case were not serious, but made in the course of jocular conversation:

The issue to the defendant is life or death. The charge made under oath against the juror is a most serious one, affecting not only the life of the defendant, but the integrity of the jury box.

We express no opinion as to the issue of fact, but it is of such quality as to merit investigation by the Circuit Court. The motion is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER Curiam.

The counsel for appellant have moved to suspend the appeal with leave to move in the Circuit Court for a new trial, on the ground that one of the jurors, Jesse Mahaffey, was not indifferent, but, on the contrary, had determined to convict the defendant before the trial commenced. In support of the motion, the defendant’s counsel have presented affidavits of persons who-swear that Mahaffey, after the trial, declared to them his intention, formed before any evidence was offered, to convict the defendant without respect to the testimony. The Solicitor submitted an 'affidavit of Mahaffey, in which 'he denies that he had made up his mind to convict before hearing the evidence, and says any remarks made about his conduct as a juror in the case were not serious, but made in the course of jocular conversation:

The issue to the defendant is life or death. The charge made under oath against the juror is a most serious one, affecting not only the life of the defendant, but the integrity of the jury box.

We express no opinion as to the issue of fact, but it is of such quality as to merit investigation by the Circuit Court. The motion is granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

61 S.E. 564, 80 S.C. 347, 1908 S.C. LEXIS 175, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-foster-sc-1908.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack