State v. Foster

13 P.2d 609, 140 Or. 200
CourtOregon Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 22, 1932
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 13 P.2d 609 (State v. Foster) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Foster, 13 P.2d 609, 140 Or. 200 (Or. 1932).

Opinions

IN BANC. Ralph Foster was convicted of larceny of livestock, and he appeals. On motion to dismiss the appeal.

APPEAL DISMISSED. The respondent moves to dismiss the appeal. Defendant was indicted, tried and convicted for the crime of larceny of livestock and served notice of appeal. The district attorney filed a motion to dismiss the appeal for the reason that it was not perfected in accordance with the statute, but the motion to dismiss the appeal does not appear to have been served upon defendant.

Section 13-1221, Oregon Code 1930, provides in a criminal action, if the appeal be irregular in a substantial *Page 201 particular, but not otherwise, the appellate court may, on motion of the respondent and notice to the defendant, order it to be dismissed.

The motion to dismiss, not being entitled to consideration, is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Stone
166 P.2d 980 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1946)
State v. Rosser
91 P.2d 295 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1939)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
13 P.2d 609, 140 Or. 200, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-foster-or-1932.