State v. Foster

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Foster

511 S.W.3d 469, 2017 WL 765929, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 96

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 28, 2017

DocketWD 78994

StatusPublished

This text of 511 S.W.3d 469 (State v. Foster) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Foster, 511 S.W.3d 469, 2017 WL 765929, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 96 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

Order

Per Curiam:

Mr. Corian E. Foster appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri, convicting him of possession of a controlled substance and unlawful use of drug paraphernalia following a bench trial. On appeal, Mr. Foster argues that the trial court erred in overruling his motion to suppress evidence. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum of law has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

Per Curiam:

Mr. Corian E. Foster appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri, convicting him of possession of a controlled substance and unlawful use of drug paraphernalia following a bench trial. On appeal, Mr. Foster argues that the trial court erred in overruling his motion to suppress evidence. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum of law has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

511 S.W.3d 469, 2017 WL 765929, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 96, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-foster-moctapp-2017.