State v. Foster
This text of 114 So. 3d 422 (State v. Foster) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The State appeals the trial court’s order withholding adjudication on Andrew Joseph Foster’s first-degree felony conviction.1 The withhold of adjudication was entered after Foster entered an open no-contest plea to the sale or possession of a controlled substance with intent to sell within 1000 feet of a school or child care facility. See § 402.302, Fla. Stat. (2010). Commendably, Foster concedes error, based upon the plain language of section 775.08435(l)(a), Florida Statutes (2012), which prohibits a court from withholding an adjudication of guilt upon a defendant who commits a first-degree felony, and State v. Joseph, 995 So.2d 1182 (Fla. 2nd DCA 2008) (recognizing that section 775.08435(l)(a) prohibits trial courts from withholding an adjudication of guilt on a defendant convicted of a first-degree felony). See also State v. Ketchum, 111 So.3d 197 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013).
Accordingly, we reverse the trial court’s withhold of adjudication and remand for entry of an adjudication of guilt.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
114 So. 3d 422, 2013 WL 2359077, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 8587, 38 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1200, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-foster-fladistctapp-2013.