State v. Foster
This text of 661 So. 2d 58 (State v. Foster) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
STATE of Florida, Appellant,
v.
Stephen FOSTER, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Michael J. Neimand, Parker D. Thomson, and Carol A. Licko, Asst. Attys. Gen., Tampa, for appellant.
James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Deborah K. Brueckheimer, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The State of Florida appeals the trial court's order granting appellee's motion to dismiss in which it determined that section 784.048, Florida Statutes (Supp. 1992), the stalking statute, is unconstitutional. The Florida Supreme Court has recently held that the statute is constitutional. Bouters v. State, 659 So.2d 235 (Fla. 1995). Accordingly, we reverse and remand with directions to reinstate the information.
Reversed and remanded with directions.
DANAHY, A.C.J., and LAZZARA and FULMER, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
661 So. 2d 58, 1995 WL 322255, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-foster-fladistctapp-1995.