State v. Foster

505 So. 2d 658, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1073, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7697
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 15, 1987
DocketNo. 85-2717
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 505 So. 2d 658 (State v. Foster) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Foster, 505 So. 2d 658, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1073, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7697 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order discharging defendant on speedy trial grounds. Defendant was not brought to trial within ten days after the hearing on his motion for discharge. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.191(i)(4). The state did not timely raise with the trial court, as it was the state’s burden to do, its argument that the hearing had been timely held and that the trial judge should have scheduled the trial within ten days thereafter. See Apolinari v. Ulmer, 483 So.2d 75, 77 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986).

LEHAN, A.C.J., and HALL and SANDERLIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Dorian
619 So. 2d 311 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
505 So. 2d 658, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1073, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7697, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-foster-fladistctapp-1987.