State v. Fortune
800 P.2d 1091, 104 Or. App. 528, 1990 Ore. App. LEXIS 1659
This text of 800 P.2d 1091 (State v. Fortune) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Fortune, 800 P.2d 1091, 104 Or. App. 528, 1990 Ore. App. LEXIS 1659 (Or. Ct. App. 1990).
Opinion
Defendant appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence seized in a search of his person. The search involved is the same one that we reviewed in State v. Yoakum, 104 Or App 291, 799 P2d 1150 (1990), and concluded was unlawful. Accordingly, the trial court erred in denying defendant’s motion to suppress.
Reversed and remanded for a new trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Yoakum
799 P.2d 1150 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1990)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
800 P.2d 1091, 104 Or. App. 528, 1990 Ore. App. LEXIS 1659, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-fortune-orctapp-1990.