State v. Fortune & Hannan
10 Mo. 466
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the Court.
This was an indictment against the defendant for keeping grocery without license. On motion, the indictment was quashed; and there being no bill of exceptions preserving the motion, the judgment must be affirmed, the other Judges concurring.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Fortune & Hannan, 10 Mo. 466 (Mo. 1847).
10 Mo. 466 (State v. Fortune & Hannan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Settle
46 S.W.2d 882 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1932)
State v. McKay
125 S.W. 478 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1910)
State v. Tooker
87 S.W. 487 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1905)
State v. Fraker
38 S.W. 909 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1897)
State v. Gee
79 Mo. 313 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1883)
Conklin v. Hannibal & St. Joseph Railroad
65 Mo. 533 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1877)
Hall v. Bray
51 Mo. 288 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1873)
Dickson v. Desire's Administrator
23 Mo. 151 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1856)
Cannan v. State
13 Mo. 421 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1850)