State v. Fortunato

District Court of Appeal of Florida

State v. Fortunato

581 So. 2d 651, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 6134, 1991 WL 117005

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 3, 1991

DocketNo. 90-2555

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 581 So. 2d 651 (State v. Fortunato) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Fortunato, 581 So. 2d 651, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 6134, 1991 WL 117005 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court in this case suppressed cocaine seized as evidence. The officer stopped appellee without probable cause (conceded by the state). Appellee dropped the cocaine after the stop and after he was ordered to lie on the ground by the officer who had his gun pointed at appellee. We affirm based on Spann v. State, 529 So.2d 825 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988) as this is a “stop then drop case.” The state’s reliance on California v. Hodari, — U.S. —, 111 S.Ct. 1547, 113 L.Ed.2d 690 (1990), which has been followed in Smith v. State, 579 So.2d 417 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); McCord v. State, 578 So.2d 908 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); and State v. Arnold, 579 So.2d 902 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991) is misplaced because those eases are all “drop then stop” cases.

However, we note express and direct conflict with State v. Oliver, 368 So.2d 1331 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1979) and State v. Perez, 15 F.L.W. 1355 (Fla. 3rd DCA May 15, 1990).

Affirmed.

LETTS, STONE and WARNER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The trial court in this case suppressed cocaine seized as evidence. The officer stopped appellee without probable cause (conceded by the state). Appellee dropped the cocaine after the stop and after he was ordered to lie on the ground by the officer who had his gun pointed at appellee. We affirm based on Spann v. State, 529 So.2d 825 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988) as this is a “stop then drop case.” The state’s reliance on California v. Hodari, — U.S. —, 111 S.Ct. 1547, 113 L.Ed.2d 690 (1990), which has been followed in Smith v. State, 579 So.2d 417 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); McCord v. State, 578 So.2d 908 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); and State v. Arnold, 579 So.2d 902 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991) is misplaced because those eases are all “drop then stop” cases.

However, we note express and direct conflict with State v. Oliver, 368 So.2d 1331 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1979) and State v. Perez, 15 F.L.W. 1355 (Fla. 3rd DCA May 15, 1990).

Affirmed.

LETTS, STONE and WARNER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

581 So. 2d 651, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 6134, 1991 WL 117005, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-fortunato-fladistctapp-1991.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack