State v. Fortig

33 N.W. 232, 71 Iowa 762
Supreme Court of Iowa·Decided June 14, 1887·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Beck, J.

The defendant, with another, was jointly indicted for maintaining a nuisance by keeping a place for the unlawful sale of intoxicating liquors, and was convicted, the other defendant being acquitted. Defendant now appeals to this court. The case is submitted to us for decision without an assignment of errors, brief or argument, or any appearance for defendant. We have carefully considered the record in the case, without finding any error or irregularity in the proceedings.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Fortig, 33 N.W. 232, 71 Iowa 762 (iowa 1887).

33 N.W. 232 (State v. Fortig) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Merrill v. Hole
52 N.W. 4 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1892)