State v. . Fort

4 N.C. 122
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJanuary 5, 1814
StatusPublished

This text of 4 N.C. 122 (State v. . Fort) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. . Fort, 4 N.C. 122 (N.C. 1814).

Opinion

Among the several objections taken to the authority of the court to award judgment on the verdict against defendant, it is alleged that no issue was joined between the State and the defendant.

On examining the record it is ascertained that the objection is true, in point of fact. The legal consequence is that there was nothing submitted to the jury, and that their verdict is nugatory.

Let there be a venire facias de novo. (123)

NOTE. — In capital cases there is no need of a formal joining of issue preparatory to trial; the prisoner's plea, and the joining of issue, called the similiter, being ore tenus. S. v. Lamon, 10 N.C. 175; S. v.Christmas, 20 N.C. 410.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. . Lamon
10 N.C. 175 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1824)
State v. Christmas
20 N.C. 410 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1839)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 N.C. 122, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-fort-nc-1814.