State v. Forsch

Louisiana Court of Appeal

State v. Forsch

511 So. 2d 1164, 1987 La. App. LEXIS 10019

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedMay 27, 1987

DocketNo. KA 87 0399

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 511 So. 2d 1164 (State v. Forsch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Forsch, 511 So. 2d 1164, 1987 La. App. LEXIS 10019 (La. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

Family Court East Baton Rouge Parish; Jennifer Luse, Judge.

APPEAL DISMISSED: This matter was not triable by jury. See La.Const. Art. I, § 16; La.C.Cr.P. art. 779; La.R.S. 14:74; State v. Clause, 486 So.2d 1206 (La.App. 1st Cir.1986). We will not consider the matter as a writ application because it fails to comply with Rule 4, Uniform Rules— Courts of Appeal. See State v. Clause, supra at fn. 2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Family Court East Baton Rouge Parish; Jennifer Luse, Judge.

APPEAL DISMISSED: This matter was not triable by jury. See La.Const. Art. I, § 16; La.C.Cr.P. art. 779; La.R.S. 14:74; State v. Clause, 486 So.2d 1206 (La.App. 1st Cir.1986). We will not consider the matter as a writ application because it fails to comply with Rule 4, Uniform Rules— Courts of Appeal. See State v. Clause, supra at fn. 2.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

511 So. 2d 1164, 1987 La. App. LEXIS 10019, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-forsch-lactapp-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack