State v. Forkner

62 N.W. 683, 94 Iowa 733
Supreme Court of Iowa·Decided April 3, 1895·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

Iviruie, J.

I. This ease is submitted1 upon the printed abstract of the record only. It appears that the defendant was charged with keeping and maintaining a liquor nuisance in the city of Des Moines. The evidence clearly shows that defendant kept a place in which intoxicating liquors were kept for sale and sold; that he and bis algents sold beer and whisky; that his place was frequently searched by police officers, and that several times kegs of beer were found there; that a regular bar was kept, which was resorted to toy large numbers of people, for the purpose of procuring beer and other 'intoxicants. The instructions fully and fairly presented the [734]*734.ease to the jury, who returned a verdiict of guilty. We have examined the entire record as set forth in the abstract, and discover no errors — 4ffirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Forkner, 62 N.W. 683, 94 Iowa 733 (iowa 1895).

62 N.W. 683 (State v. Forkner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ex Parte Mode
180 S.W. 703 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1915)
Coggeshall v. City of Des Moines
117 N.W. 309 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1908)
Eckerson v. City of Des Moines
115 N.W. 177 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1908)
State v. Edmunds
101 N.W. 431 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1904)
In re O'Brien
75 P. 196 (Montana Supreme Court, 1904)
City of Des Moines v. Keller
57 L.R.A. 243 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1902)
State v. Pressman
72 N.W. 660 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1897)
Clark v. Riddle
70 N.W. 207 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1897)
McKeever v. Beacom
70 N.W. 112 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1897)