State v. Ford

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Ford

923 N.E.2d 620, 124 Ohio St. 3d 1519

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 24, 2010

Docket2010-0235

StatusPublished

This text of 923 N.E.2d 620 (State v. Ford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Ford, 923 N.E.2d 620, 124 Ohio St. 3d 1519 (Ohio 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

Licking App. No. 2008 CA 158, 2009-Ohio-6724. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated in the court of appeals’ Judgment Entry filed January 22, 2010:

“Whether discharging a firearm at or into a habitation (R.C. 2923.161) and a firearm specification (R.C. 2929.14(D), R.C. 2941.145) are allied offenses of similar import as defined by R.C. 2941.25(A).”

O’Connor, O’Donnell, and Cupp, JJ., dissent.

The conflict case is State v. Elko, Cuyahoga App. No. 83641, 2004-Ohio-5209.

Motion for appointment of counsel is granted. Christopher Shook of Newark, Ohio, is appointed as counsel for appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI