State v. Ford

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Ford

535 S.W.3d 428

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 26, 2017

DocketWD 80096

StatusPublished

This text of 535 S.W.3d 428 (State v. Ford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Ford, 535 S.W.3d 428 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

Order

Per Curiam

Lewis Ford appeals from his conviction for second degree domestic assault. He contends the circuit court erred in excluding testimony about his prior military service and post-traumatic stress disorder. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the judgment. We have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision, because a published opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose.

AFFIRMED. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

Per Curiam

Lewis Ford appeals from his conviction for second degree domestic assault. He contends the circuit court erred in excluding testimony about his prior military service and post-traumatic stress disorder. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the judgment. We have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision, because a published opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose.

AFFIRMED. Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

535 S.W.3d 428, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-ford-moctapp-2017.