State v. Ford & Baldwin

1 N.J.L. 53

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided April 15, 1791·Published

Opinion

The court quashed the order. — ■

1st Because the line was run, without giving any notice to Ogdeny and only 4 days to Minn the tenant.

[54]*542d Because the surveyors altered a line fence acquiesced in, for. 25 years.

3d It was proved that as the lands became improved, a fence had always been erected according to the old line.

4th Under pretence of settling a line fence, the surveyor» have tried a title.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The court quashed the order. — ■

1st Because the line was run, without giving any notice to Ogdeny and only 4 days to Minn the tenant.

[54]*542d Because the surveyors altered a line fence acquiesced in, for. 25 years.

3d It was proved that as the lands became improved, a fence had always been erected according to the old line.

4th Under pretence of settling a line fence, the surveyor» have tried a title.

State v. Ford & Baldwin, 1 N.J.L. 53 (N.J. 1791).

Pincite

1 N.J.L. 53 (State v. Ford & Baldwin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.