State v. Fontana
101 A.2d 559, 14 N.J. 173, 1954 N.J. LEXIS 307
Opinion
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Superior Court, Appellate Division.
For affirmance — Chief Justice Vanderbilt, and Justices Heher, Oliphant. Wachenfeld, Burling, Jacobs and Brennan — 7.
For reversal — Hone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Fontana, 101 A.2d 559, 14 N.J. 173, 1954 N.J. LEXIS 307 (N.J. 1954).
101 A.2d 559 (State v. Fontana) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lozano v. Frank DeLuca Construction
842 A.2d 156 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2004)
State v. De Lucia
164 A.2d 81 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1960)
In re Dandridge
186 F. Supp. 276 (D. New Jersey, 1960)
Worbetz v. Goodman
136 A.2d 1 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1957)
State v. Rose
122 A.2d 189 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1956)
State v. Forsythe
120 A.2d 127 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1956)
Maraziti v. Corigliano
101 A.2d 559 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1953)