State v. Fonseca
This text of 335 Or. App. 637 (State v. Fonseca) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
No. 757 October 23, 2024 637
This is a nonprecedential memorandum opinion pursuant to ORAP 10.30 and may not be cited except as provided in ORAP 10.30(1).
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON
STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. MAXIMIANO FONSECA FONSECA, aka Maximiano Fonseca, Defendant-Appellant. Lane County Circuit Court 19CR25452; A180939
Charles M. Zennaché, Judge. Submitted September 24, 2024. Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate Section, and Shawn Wiley, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Kyleigh Gray, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent. Before Tookey, Presiding Judge, Kamins, Judge, and Armstrong, Senior Judge. PER CURIAM Affirmed. State v. Horner, 306 Or App 402, 474 P3d 394 (2020); modified on recons on other grounds, 309 Or App 136, 481 P3d 442 (2021); State v. Parker, 259 Or App 547, 314 P3d 980 (2013), rev den, 355 Or 380 (2014).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
335 Or. App. 637, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-fonseca-orctapp-2024.