State v. Folwell

20 A. 1079, 53 N.J.L. 176, 24 Vroom 176, 1890 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 5
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedNovember 15, 1890
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 20 A. 1079 (State v. Folwell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Folwell, 20 A. 1079, 53 N.J.L. 176, 24 Vroom 176, 1890 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 5 (N.J. 1890).

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Reed, J.

This case is controlled by Barclay v. Brabston, 20 Vroom 629. Where the court for the trial of small causes had no jurisdiction over the subject matter of the action, relief can be had either by certiorari or by appeal. Williamson v. Middlesex Common Pleas, 13 Id. 386. But when the cause of action is Avithin the jurisdiction of the court, and there ivas lack of jurisdiction over the party appealing by reason of irregular adjournments, the taking of an appeal operated as a Avaiver of the irregularity. The remedy was by certiorari.

Judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Richardson v. Smith
65 A. 162 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1906)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
20 A. 1079, 53 N.J.L. 176, 24 Vroom 176, 1890 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 5, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-folwell-nj-1890.