State v. Folsom Water Co.
12 P. 388, 2 Cal. Unrep. 704
This text of 12 P. 388 (State v. Folsom Water Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Folsom Water Co., 12 P. 388, 2 Cal. Unrep. 704 (Cal. 1886).
Opinion
We are of opinion that the deed from the Natoma Water & Mining Company to the state did not impose an obligation upon the company to proceed to the completion of the canal. Therefore the ruling of the court below on the demurrer was correct. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
12 P. 388, 2 Cal. Unrep. 704, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-folsom-water-co-cal-1886.