State v. Foley

Supreme Court of Missouri

State v. Foley

113 S.W. 1050, 214 Mo. 309, 1908 Mo. LEXIS 225

DecidedNovember 24, 1908

StatusPublished

This text of 113 S.W. 1050 (State v. Foley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Foley, 113 S.W. 1050, 214 Mo. 309, 1908 Mo. LEXIS 225 (Mo. 1908).

Pincite

Opinion

GANTT, J.

From a conviction in the circuit court of the city of St. Louis for a felonious assault upon Edwin McClentick, the defendant appealed to this court.

Motions for new trial and in arrest of judgment were filed in due time and overruled, hut no hill of exceptions was filed in the case. The information is sufficient and the arraignment and the trial appear to [310]*310have been regular in all respects. There being no error in the record proper, the judgment must be and is affirmed.

Fox, P. J., and Burgess, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GANTT, J.

From a conviction in the circuit court of the city of St. Louis for a felonious assault upon Edwin McClentick, the defendant appealed to this court.

Motions for new trial and in arrest of judgment were filed in due time and overruled, hut no hill of exceptions was filed in the case. The information is sufficient and the arraignment and the trial appear to [310]*310have been regular in all respects. There being no error in the record proper, the judgment must be and is affirmed.

Fox, P. J., and Burgess, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

113 S.W. 1050, 214 Mo. 309, 1908 Mo. LEXIS 225, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-foley-mo-1908.