State v. Fogle

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Fogle

520 S.W.3d 836, 2017 WL 2823134, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 664

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 30, 2017·No. No. ED 105135·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The State of Missouri appeals from the trial court’s Order granting the motion to • suppress physical evidence and statements obtained in a traffic stop, filed by Jax Fogle. We find no error has occurred.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum [837] setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The State of Missouri appeals from the trial court’s Order granting the motion to • suppress physical evidence and statements obtained in a traffic stop, filed by Jax Fogle. We find no error has occurred.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum [837] setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Fogle, 520 S.W.3d 836, 2017 WL 2823134, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 664 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

520 S.W.3d 836 (State v. Fogle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.