State v. Fogle

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Fogle

520 S.W.3d 836, 2017 WL 2823134, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 664

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 30, 2017

DocketNo. ED 105135

StatusPublished

This text of 520 S.W.3d 836 (State v. Fogle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Fogle, 520 S.W.3d 836, 2017 WL 2823134, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 664 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The State of Missouri appeals from the trial court’s Order granting the motion to • suppress physical evidence and statements obtained in a traffic stop, filed by Jax Fogle. We find no error has occurred.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum [837]*837setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The State of Missouri appeals from the trial court’s Order granting the motion to • suppress physical evidence and statements obtained in a traffic stop, filed by Jax Fogle. We find no error has occurred.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum [837]*837setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

520 S.W.3d 836, 2017 WL 2823134, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 664, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-fogle-moctapp-2017.