State v. Fogg

539 A.2d 205, 1987 Me. LEXIS 892
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedDecember 28, 1987
StatusPublished

This text of 539 A.2d 205 (State v. Fogg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Fogg, 539 A.2d 205, 1987 Me. LEXIS 892 (Me. 1987).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

The State appeals from an order of the Superior Court, Penobscot County, suppressing evidence obtained after an investigative stop of an automobile driven by the defendant, John Fogg. Contrary to the State’s contention on appeal, we conclude from a review of the record that the motion justice’s determination that the arresting officer did not have a reasonably articulable suspicion sufficient to justify his investigatory stop was not clearly erroneous. See State v. Chapman, 495 A.2d 314, 317-18 (Me.1985). We therefore affirm the judgment.

The entry is:

Judgment affirmed.

All concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Chapman
495 A.2d 314 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
539 A.2d 205, 1987 Me. LEXIS 892, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-fogg-me-1987.