State v. Flynn

Idaho Supreme Court

State v. Flynn

248 P. 1118, 43 Idaho 22, 1926 Ida. LEXIS 9

DecidedAugust 2, 1926

StatusPublished

This text of 248 P. 1118 (State v. Flynn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Idaho Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Flynn, 248 P. 1118, 43 Idaho 22, 1926 Ida. LEXIS 9 (Idaho 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

BUDGE, J.

Appellant was convicted of the crime of statutory rape, committed upon a ten year old girl, and he appeals from the judgment.

The record discloses a state of facts the nature of which are such that no useful purpose could be served by reciting them. Such objections as were made during the trial to the admission and exclusion of evidence, and exceptions to the court’s rulings thereon, present no reversible error. No exceptions were taken to the instructions, and they are not here for review. .

Appellant assigns as error the insufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict and judgment entered thereon, and particularly emphasizes the insufficiency of the evidence to establish penetration, and corroboration of the prosecutrix. We have examined the record fully and have reached the conclusion that there is sufficient competent evidence to support the verdict and judgment. No reversible error appearing, the judgment is affirmed.

William A. Lee, O. J., and Wm. E. Lee, Givens and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BUDGE, J.

Appellant was convicted of the crime of statutory rape, committed upon a ten year old girl, and he appeals from the judgment.

The record discloses a state of facts the nature of which are such that no useful purpose could be served by reciting them. Such objections as were made during the trial to the admission and exclusion of evidence, and exceptions to the court’s rulings thereon, present no reversible error. No exceptions were taken to the instructions, and they are not here for review. .

Appellant assigns as error the insufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict and judgment entered thereon, and particularly emphasizes the insufficiency of the evidence to establish penetration, and corroboration of the prosecutrix. We have examined the record fully and have reached the conclusion that there is sufficient competent evidence to support the verdict and judgment. No reversible error appearing, the judgment is affirmed.

William A. Lee, O. J., and Wm. E. Lee, Givens and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

248 P. 1118, 43 Idaho 22, 1926 Ida. LEXIS 9, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-flynn-idaho-1926.