State v. Floyd

197 S.E.2d 801, 18 N.C. App. 677, 1973 N.C. App. LEXIS 1980
CourtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina
DecidedJuly 11, 1973
DocketNo. 7310SC435
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 197 S.E.2d 801 (State v. Floyd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Floyd, 197 S.E.2d 801, 18 N.C. App. 677, 1973 N.C. App. LEXIS 1980 (N.C. Ct. App. 1973).

Opinion

BALEY, Judge.

After a careful examination of the record we are unable to find error in the proceedings in the court below. Defendant was convicted by a jury upon a plea of not guilty. The indictments were proper in form and the evidence of the State was sufficient to support the verdict. Sentence imposed was within statutory limits.

Upon the record, defendant received a fair trial, free from prejudicial error.

No error.

Judges Campbell and Hedrick concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Floyd
198 S.E.2d 725 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1973)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
197 S.E.2d 801, 18 N.C. App. 677, 1973 N.C. App. LEXIS 1980, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-floyd-ncctapp-1973.