State v. Floyd

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Floyd

499 S.W.3d 320, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 905

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 13, 2016·No. WD 78574 Consolidated with WD 78575·Published

Opinion

Order

Per Curiam:

Mr. Thomas R. Floyd, Jr., appeals his convictions for third-degree assault of a law enforcement officer and third-degree assault. Mr. Floyd asserts the trial court erred in: (1) granting leave to the State to amend the information relating to third-degree assault of a law enforcement officer; (2) overruling his motion for judgment of acquittal at the close of the evidence as to the third-degree assault charge; and (3) failing to, sua sponte, instruct the jury on self-defense on the charges of third-degree assault and unlawful use of a weapon. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum of law has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

Per Curiam:

Mr. Thomas R. Floyd, Jr., appeals his convictions for third-degree assault of a law enforcement officer and third-degree assault. Mr. Floyd asserts the trial court erred in: (1) granting leave to the State to amend the information relating to third-degree assault of a law enforcement officer; (2) overruling his motion for judgment of acquittal at the close of the evidence as to the third-degree assault charge; and (3) failing to, sua sponte, instruct the jury on self-defense on the charges of third-degree assault and unlawful use of a weapon. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum of law has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Floyd, 499 S.W.3d 320, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 905 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

499 S.W.3d 320 (State v. Floyd) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.