State v. Flores

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Flores

285 S.W.3d 835, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1001, 2009 WL 1851087

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 30, 2009

DocketWD 69200

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 285 S.W.3d 835 (State v. Flores) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Flores, 285 S.W.3d 835, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1001, 2009 WL 1851087 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Following a jury trial, Jose Flores appeals from his convictions on two counts of first-degree statutory sodomy. Flores contends the circuit court erred in overruling his objection to expert witness testimony regarding the credibility of the victims, which invaded the province of the jury. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the convictions.

AFFIRMED. Rule 30.26(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Following a jury trial, Jose Flores appeals from his convictions on two counts of first-degree statutory sodomy. Flores contends the circuit court erred in overruling his objection to expert witness testimony regarding the credibility of the victims, which invaded the province of the jury. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the convictions.

AFFIRMED. Rule 30.26(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

285 S.W.3d 835, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1001, 2009 WL 1851087, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-flores-moctapp-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack