State v. . Flood
129 S.E. 145, 190 N.C. 848, 1925 N.C. LEXIS 190
Opinion
The defendant in apt time moved to set aside the verdict on the ground of newly discovered evidence. His Honor heard oral testimony not available to the defendant at the trial and in his discretion denied the motion. In this, we find no error. The motion, of course, cannot be entertained in this Court. S. v. Jenkins, 182 N. C., 818. The demurrer to the evidence and the motion to vacate the verdict on the ground that the State’s evidence was insufficient were properly overruled. There are no other assignments of error.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. . Flood, 129 S.E. 145, 190 N.C. 848, 1925 N.C. LEXIS 190 (N.C. 1925).
129 S.E. 145 (State v. . Flood) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. . Jenkins
108 S.E. 767 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1921)