State v. Flenoy

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Flenoy

936 S.W.2d 175, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1995, 1996 WL 705824

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 10, 1996

DocketNo. 69879

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 936 S.W.2d 175 (State v. Flenoy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Flenoy, 936 S.W.2d 175, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1995, 1996 WL 705824 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from the judgment on his conviction by a jury of murder in the second degree, § 565.021, RSMo 1994, for which he was sentenced to life imprisonment. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from the judgment on his conviction by a jury of murder in the second degree, § 565.021, RSMo 1994, for which he was sentenced to life imprisonment. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

936 S.W.2d 175, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1995, 1996 WL 705824, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-flenoy-moctapp-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack