Home/Ohio Supreme Court/State v. Fleming

State v. Fleming

888 N.E.2d 412, 118 Ohio St. 3d 265
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJune 4, 2008
DocketNo. 2007-1648
StatusPublished

This text of 888 N.E.2d 412 (State v. Fleming) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Fleming, 888 N.E.2d 412, 118 Ohio St. 3d 265 (Ohio 2008).

Opinion

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed as to the court of appeals’ holding on appellant’s fifth assignment of error below on the authority of [266]*266State v. Cabrales, 118 Ohio St.3d 54, 2008-Ohio-1625, 886 N.E.2d 181. The cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with State v. Cabrales, including a determination as to whether the offenses were committed with a separate animus under R.C. 2941.25(B).

Robert L. Tobik, Cuyahoga County Public Defender, and Robert M. Ingersoll, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant. Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Cabrales
886 N.E.2d 181 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
888 N.E.2d 412, 118 Ohio St. 3d 265, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-fleming-ohio-2008.