State v. Fleming

76 So. 3d 417, 2011 La. LEXIS 3008, 2011 WL 6309435
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided December 16, 2011·No. 2011-KK-1736·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

| ,Writ granted. The ruling of the trial court granting the motion to suppress is reversed, and the motion to suppress is denied. The trial court erred in re lying on Kirk v. Louisiana, 536 U.S. 635, 122 S.Ct. 2458, 153 L.Ed.2d 599 (2002). Based on the totality of the evidence presented at the hearing on the motion to suppress, the investigating officers had exigent circumstances to enter the structure located behind the residence after they observed: (1) marijuana smoked inside which was capable of being immediately destroyed; and (2) two guns (perhaps relating to the planned armed robbery described by the anonymous caller) creating a situation they had not yet figured out, thus justifying the need to take unquestioned command of the situation immediately. The case is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Fleming, 76 So. 3d 417, 2011 La. LEXIS 3008, 2011 WL 6309435 (La. 2011).

76 So. 3d 417 (State v. Fleming) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kirk v. Louisiana
536 U.S. 635 (Supreme Court, 2002)