State v. Flannery

2021 Ohio 37
Ohio Court of Appeals·Decided January 11, 2021·No. CA2020-07-073·Published

Opinion

[Cite as State v. Flannery, 2021-Ohio-37.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO

BUTLER COUNTY

STATE OF OHIO, :

Appellee, : CASE NO. CA2020-07-073

: DECISION - vs - 1/11/2021 :

GERALD FLANNERY, :

Appellant. :

CRIMINAL APPEAL FROM HAMILTON MUNICIPAL COURT Case No. 20CRB00493

Neal D. Schuett, City of Hamilton Prosecuting Attorney, 345 High Street, 2nd Floor, Hamilton, OH 45011, for appellee

Christopher P. Frederick, 300 High Street, Suite 550, Hamilton, Ohio 45011, for appellant

Per Curiam.

{¶1} This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal filed by

appellant, Gerald Flannery, the transcript of the docket and journal entries, the transcript of

proceedings and original papers from the Butler County Court of Common Pleas, and upon

the brief filed by appellant's counsel.

{¶2} Appellant's counsel has filed a brief with this court pursuant to Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), which (1) indicates that a careful review of Butler CA2020-07-073

the record from the proceedings below fails to disclose any errors by the trial court

prejudicial to the rights of appellant upon which an assignment of error may be predicated;

(2) lists one potential error "that might arguably support the appeal," Anders, at 744, 87

S.Ct. at 1400; (3) requests that this court review the record independently to determine

whether the proceedings are free from prejudicial error and without infringement of

appellant's constitutional rights; (4) requests permission to withdraw as counsel for

appellant on the basis that the appeal is wholly frivolous; and (5) certifies that a copy of both

the brief and motion to withdraw have been served upon appellant.

{¶3} Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no response having

been received, we have accordingly examined the record and find no error prejudicial to

appellant's rights in the proceedings in the trial court. The motion of counsel for appellant

requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this appeal is dismissed for the reason

that it is wholly frivolous.

M. POWELL, P.J., S. POWELL and PIPER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Flannery, 2021 Ohio 37 (Ohio Ct. App. 2021).

2021 Ohio 37 (State v. Flannery) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)