State v. Flank

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Flank

666 So. 2d 316, 1996 La. LEXIS 152, 1996 WL 15636

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedJanuary 12, 1996

DocketNo. 93-KH-1094

StatusPublished

This text of 666 So. 2d 316 (State v. Flank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Flank, 666 So. 2d 316, 1996 La. LEXIS 152, 1996 WL 15636 (La. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Flank, Raymond; Defendant; applying for reconsideration of this Court’s Order dated November 13,1995; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “E”, No. 299-809.

Reconsideration denied. Though relator now points out that he filed an application for post-conviction relief in the district court timely, see, e.g., Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 108 S.Ct. 2379, 101 L.Ed.2d 245 (1988); State ex rel. Gray. v. State, 94-1002 (La. 6/30/95), 657 So.2d 1005, further review reveals that relator raised identical claims on appeal. See State v. Flank, 537 So.2d 236, 238-42 (La.App. 4th Cir.1988). In this case, the interest of justice does not require further consideration of relator’s repetitive claims. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4(A).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Flank, Raymond; Defendant; applying for reconsideration of this Court’s Order dated November 13,1995; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “E”, No. 299-809.

Reconsideration denied. Though relator now points out that he filed an application for post-conviction relief in the district court timely, see, e.g., Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 108 S.Ct. 2379, 101 L.Ed.2d 245 (1988); State ex rel. Gray. v. State, 94-1002 (La. 6/30/95), 657 So.2d 1005, further review reveals that relator raised identical claims on appeal. See State v. Flank, 537 So.2d 236, 238-42 (La.App. 4th Cir.1988). In this case, the interest of justice does not require further consideration of relator’s repetitive claims. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4(A).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

666 So. 2d 316, 1996 La. LEXIS 152, 1996 WL 15636, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-flank-la-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack