State v. Flanigan

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee·Decided June 26, 1998·No. 03C01-9708-CR-00330·Published

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT KNOXVILLE FILED MAY 1998 SESSION June 26, 1998

Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appellate C ourt Clerk STATE OF TENNESSEE, ) ) Appellee, ) No. 03C01-9708-CR-00330 ) ) Sullivan County v. ) ) Honorable Phyllis H. Miller, Judge ) LULA J. FLANIGAN, ) (Aggravated Kidnapping and ) Aggravated Assault) Appellant. )

CONCURRING OPINION

I concur in the majority opinion. I add, though, that I do not believe we

have to conduct the two-prong inquiry provided in State v. Anthony, 817 S.W.2d 299

(Tenn. 1991) and State v. Dixon, 957 S.W.2d 532 (Tenn. 1997). This is because an

aggravated assault does not necessarily include the elements of kidnapping. Thus, I

believe that an Anthony issue is not even implicated.

____________________________ Joseph M. Tipton, Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Flanigan, (Tenn. Ct. App. 1998).

State v. Flanigan (State v. Flanigan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Dixon
957 S.W.2d 532 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1997)
State v. Anthony
817 S.W.2d 299 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1991)