State v. Flanigan

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Flanigan

278 S.W.3d 247, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 345, 2009 WL 685333

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 17, 2009

DocketED 91020

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 278 S.W.3d 247 (State v. Flanigan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Flanigan, 278 S.W.3d 247, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 345, 2009 WL 685333 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Stephen Flanigan (Appellant) appeals from his judgment of conviction and sentence arguing the trial court erred in denying his request for a continuance and in sustaining the State’s objection and excluding evidence offered by Appellant. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that there was no error of law. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Stephen Flanigan (Appellant) appeals from his judgment of conviction and sentence arguing the trial court erred in denying his request for a continuance and in sustaining the State’s objection and excluding evidence offered by Appellant. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that there was no error of law. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

278 S.W.3d 247, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 345, 2009 WL 685333, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-flanigan-moctapp-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack