State v. Fitzgerald
738 A.2d 1092, 251 Conn. 903, 1999 Conn. LEXIS 361
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedSeptember 29, 1999
DocketSC 16195
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 738 A.2d 1092 (State v. Fitzgerald) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Fitzgerald, 738 A.2d 1092, 251 Conn. 903, 1999 Conn. LEXIS 361 (Colo. 1999).
Opinion
The petition of the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 54 Conn. App. 258 (AC 16687), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Under the circumstances of this case, did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the mention by the state of a part B information required that the judgment of conviction be reversed?”
SULLIVAN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Fitzgerald
777 A.2d 580 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2001)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
738 A.2d 1092, 251 Conn. 903, 1999 Conn. LEXIS 361, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-fitzgerald-conn-1999.