State v. Fisher

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Fisher

374 S.W.3d 398, 2012 WL 3656347, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1047

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 28, 2012·No. No. WD 74017·Published

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM:

Randy J. Fisher appeals his convictions of two counts of statutory sodomy, arguing that the trial court erred in allowing, pursuant to section 491.075, RSMo Cum.Supp. 2008, testimony regarding the victim’s out-of-court statements. Fisher alleges that [399] allowing this testimony constituted improper bolstering of the victim’s testimony. We disagree and affirm Fisher’s convictions. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

PER CURIAM:

Randy J. Fisher appeals his convictions of two counts of statutory sodomy, arguing that the trial court erred in allowing, pursuant to section 491.075, RSMo Cum.Supp. 2008, testimony regarding the victim’s out-of-court statements. Fisher alleges that [399] allowing this testimony constituted improper bolstering of the victim’s testimony. We disagree and affirm Fisher’s convictions. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Fisher, 374 S.W.3d 398, 2012 WL 3656347, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1047 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

374 S.W.3d 398 (State v. Fisher) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.